The Truth Behind International Climate Agreements: Why They Fail and Why the Bottom-Up is the Way Forward. A Game Theory Analysis

        I. INTRODUCTION Climate change is one of the biggest problems facing the world today. It is no longer just environmental groups who are warning of the threat. In 2014, the Pentagon released a report in which they determined that climate change was the greatest threat to national security, citing rising sea levels, more violent storms, and increased widespread droughts.[2] Major companies have also joined the call for action, with eighty-one companies signing the American Business Act on Climate Pledge, which calls Continue reading →

The Transfer of Public Lands Movement: The Battle to Take “Back” Lands That Were Never Theirs

  Introduction Long a hotbed of discontent over federal public land management, Utah rekindled the “sagebrush rebellion” in 2012 when it enacted the Transfer of Public Lands Act (“TPLA”),[2] demanding that the federal government turn millions of acres of public land[3] over to the state. Utah’s efforts became a model for legislation that sprang up across the West, and transfer theories were adopted as part of the Republican National Committee Platform. A growing minority is also seizing on Utah’s theories to justify wresting public lands Continue reading →

The Hard(rock) Truth About Abandoned Mines in the Western United States: Why the Pressure Is On to Enact Good Samaritan Legislation as a Way to Recover

      I. INTRODUCTION The water was mustard yellow. It was unnatural and unsafe, but was it unexpected? The normally blue, free-flowing Animas River, which flows from Southern Colorado into New Mexico, a part of the Colorado River System, was instantly transformed from a serene, natural river into a toxic wasteland. Three million gallons of toxic mining waste rushed into the Animas River on August 5, 2015, spilling over from Gold King Mine, located near Silverton, Colorado.[2] Although Gold King Mine has been inactive Continue reading →

Still Melting: How Climate Change and Subsistence Laws Constrain Alaska Native Village Adaptation

Subsistence hunting and fishing practices are essential to maintain the physical, economic, and cultural continuity of Alaska Native Villages (“ANVs”). The combination of rapid climate change, laws that restrict hunting and fishing, and systems for participating in decision-making about hunting and fishing all limit the ways in which ANV residents can legally adapt their subsistence practices to fluctuations in species populations and location. This Article outlines impacts to subsistence experienced by ANV residents, legal and institutional constraints to adaptation, and recommendations for change. A key Continue reading →

Speech: In Love With the Wild: Thoughts About the Public Lands in the 21st Century

[1]Years ago, the writer and activist Terry Tempest Williams and I stood on the sidewalk in front of the Whitney Museum in New York asking passersby if they knew what the BLM is. Terry makes me do things like that. The first nine cosmopolitan people had no idea whatsoever, so Terry, who had bet that somebody would know, cheated. She spied a woman wearing heavy turquoise jewelry crossing the street and ran over to accost her. The woman, freshly arrived from Idaho, broke the streak Continue reading →

In Atmosphere We Trust: Atmospheric Trust Litigation and the Environmental Advocate’s Toolkit

Introduction In May 2018, carbon dioxide in the atmosphere averaged 411.24 parts per million, representing the highest concentration ever recorded.[2] Greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide, largely produced by human activities, have led to increasing global temperatures that will likely continue to rise for decades.[3] As a result of climate change, glaciers are shrinking, ice on rivers and lakes is melting earlier in the season, trees are flowering sooner, heat waves are longer and more intense, and sea levels are rising.[4] Drought, hurricanes, wildfires, and flooding Continue reading →

Colorado’s Ground-Level Ozone Burden

      I. INTRODUCTION Since 1970, the federal government has been regulating ground-level ozone under the Clean Air Act (“CAA”). At the ground level, ozone is an air pollutant, which can be harmful to humans, animals, and vegetation. Ground-level ozone is, in part, created by man-made emissions from industrial processes and vehicle exhaust. In October 2015, the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) announced its most aggressive regulatory action ever regarding ground-level ozone. For years, Colorado has struggled with attaining the federal government’s ozone requirements, and Continue reading →

Giving BioJet Wings: Policy Instruments for a Carbon Neutral Aviation Sector

Sustainable Aviation Fuels (“SAFs”) entered commercial markets a decade ago to replace fossil fuels. Unlike in road transport, where biofuels have been gradually deployed, the uptake of SAF in aviation has been very slow. The objective of this article is to explore how policymakers around the world have responded to the call to make aviation more sustainable through the use of SAF. The Article pursues this objective through a detailed analysis of five types of policy instruments, which are considered the most innovative worldwide in Continue reading →

Wringing Wonder From the Arid Landscape of Law

      INTRODUCTION It is easy to celebrate the multi-faceted work of Charles Wilkinson. His public service has given voice to many lives and communities. His teaching has transformed ambitions, including my own.[2] His wide-ranging writing has inspired uncounted thousands. Canvassing Professor Wilkinson’s full influence would require an article that would swallow any single issue of this law journal. Therefore, I limit my own tribute to the aspect of his many works I know the best: Wilkinson’s profound contribution to public land law scholarship. Continue reading →

Speech: Cost-Nothing Analysis: Environmental Economics in the Age of Trump

I am going to talk tonight about economic analysis of environmental policy. My talk has four main parts, plus a conclusion that not everyone will like. First, I’m going to explain how, over several decades, cost-benefit analysis came to dominate federal environmental policy. Next, I will explain why I believe cost-benefit analysis is a problematic way to evaluate environmental policy. After that, I’ll turn to a discussion of how the Obama administration approached these issues. And fourth, I will describe how, in the Trump administration, Continue reading →